Out-of-Pocket Costs and Payments in Autologous and Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Nationwide Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Many factors influence a patient's decision to undergo autologous versus implant-based breast reconstruction, including medical, social, and financial considerations. This study aims to investigate differences in out-of-pocket and total spending for patients undergoing autologous and implant-based breast reconstruction. METHODS: The IBM MarketScan Commercial Databases were queried to extract all patients who underwent inpatient autologous or implant-based breast reconstruction from 2017 to 2021. Financial variables included gross payments to the provider (facility and/or physician) and out-of-pocket costs (total of coinsurance, deductible, and copayments). Univariate regressions assessed differences between autologous and implant-based reconstruction procedures. Mixed-effects linear regression was used to analyze parametric contributions to total gross and out-of-pocket costs. RESULTS: The sample identified 2079 autologous breast reconstruction and 1475 implant-based breast reconstruction episodes. Median out-of-pocket costs were significantly higher for autologous reconstruction than implant-based reconstruction ($597 vs $250, P < 0.001) as were total payments ($63,667 vs $31,472, P < 0.001). Type of insurance plan and region contributed to variable out-of-pocket costs (P < 0.001). Regression analysis revealed that autologous reconstruction contributes significantly to increasing out-of-pocket costs (B = $597, P = 0.025) and increasing total costs (B = $74,507, P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: The US national data demonstrate that autologous breast reconstruction has higher out-of-pocket costs and higher gross payments than implant-based reconstruction. More study is needed to determine the extent to which these financial differences affect patient decision-making.

An Analysis of Medical Malpractice Litigation Involving Orbital Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Orbital fractures frequently require operative management by a plastic and reconstructive surgeon. Due to the proximity to the globe and complexity of the reconstruction, orbital fractures, and related procedures have the potential to be a source of medical litigation. The aim of the present study was to review orbital fracture malpractice litigation, including case outcomes and compensatory damages. METHODS: The Westlaw and Lexis Nexis databases were queried for jury verdicts and settlements related to orbital fracture malpractice lawsuits. The Boolean terms included "orbit! /10 fracture," "orbit! & fracture," and "ocular & fracture" for both databases. Cases were included if they were state or federal cases related to both orbital fracture and medical malpractice involving surgical or medical mismanagement or misdiagnosis of orbital fracture. RESULTS: A total of 49 cases from 1994 to 2018 met inclusion criteria between the databases. The most common legal complaint was the defendant's failure to make a diagnosis either by not ordering the proper radiological tests or by not interpreting radiological tests correctly, seen in 35% of cases. In 57% of the cases, the defendant was a surgeon, 46% of which involved a plastic surgeon specifically. Cases were resolved in favor of the defendant 49% of the time. Most cases (57%) resulted in a monetary outcome of $0. However, cases that were decided in favor of the plaintiff had significant compensatory damages with the majority being over $100,000, and 1 case as high as $8 million. CONCLUSION: Although almost half of the orbital fracture malpractice cases resulted in an outcome favoring the defendant, significant monetary consequences against the defendant were possible in cases when the plaintiff prevailed.

Predicting Postsurgical Complications of Peripheral Nerve Decompression: NSQIP Analysis of Frailty Measures Versus Historic Proxies.

Background: Peripheral nerve decompression (PND) is generally safe, and newer techniques allow frail patients to undergo PND at less common sites. Current literature suggests patient frailty measures may more accurately predict postsurgical complications versus other proxies, but no current literature examines frailty in PND. Methods: The authors reviewed data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program for patients who underwent PND outside the most common sites from 2013 to 2019. The modified 5-Item Frailty Index (mFI-5) and modified Charlson Comorbidity Index (mCCI) scores were calculated, and complications data were gathered. Age, body mass index (BMI), major comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, and frailty were compared as predictors of all-cause 30-day complications, 30-day surgical site complications, length of stay, and complication severity, using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Results: Of 1120 patients, the mean age was 51.3 (15.4) years and mean BMI was 30.6 (7.0) kg/m2. Patients were predominantly white and healthy. The complication rate was 3.4%. All-cause complications were predicted by ≥3 major comorbidities (odds ratio [OR], 95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.26, 1.36-21.32; P = .007), followed by mFI-5 score and mCCI score. Complication severity was associated with major comorbidities and mFI-5 score, while length of stay was most strongly predicted by age ≥ 65 years (OR, 95% CI: 2.17, 1.37-3.42; P = .0008) and mCCI score of 3 (OR, 95% CI: 1.77, 1.01-3.05; P = 0.041). The only risk factor for readmission was mFI-5 score of 1 (OR, 95% CI: 7.00, 1.68-47.16; P = .016). Conclusions: Frailty and risk proxies may predict postoperative complications in PND at uncommon sites. Use of frailty indices may expand the age range of patients offered PND. Further research is necessary to delineate contributing risk factors and to clarify 24-hour observation and admissions.

Statistical fragility of outcomes in acellular dermal matrix literature: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) is commonly used in plastic and reconstructive surgery. With the abundance of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting P-values for ADM outcomes, this study used the fragility index (FI), reverse fragility index (rFI), and fragility quotient (FQ) to evaluate the statistical stability of the outcomes in ADM RCTs. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, SCOPUS, Medline, and Cochrane databases were reviewed for ADM RCTs (2003-present) reporting a dichotomous, categorical outcome. FI and rFI (event reversals influencing outcome significance) and FQ (standardized fragility) were calculated and reported as median. Subgroup analysis was performed based on intervention types. RESULTS: Among the 127 studies screened, 56 RCTs with 579 outcomes were included. The median FI stood at 4 (3-5) and FQ was 0.04 (0.03-0.07). Only 101 outcomes were statistically significant with a median FI of 3 (1-6) and FQ of 0.04 (0.02-0.08). The nonsignificant outcomes had a median FI of 4 (3-5) and FQ of 0.04 (0.03-0.07). Notably, 26% of the outcomes had several patients lost to follow up equal to or surpassing the FI. Based on the intervention type, the median FIs showed minor fluctuations but remained low. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes from ADM-related RCTs were statistically fragile. Slight outcome reversals or maintenance of patient follow-up can alter the significance of results. Therefore, future researchers are recommended to jointly report FI, FQ, and P-values to offer a comprehensive view of the robustness in ADM literature.

Subcutaneous fat necrosis of the newborn: A systematic review of surgical management and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Subcutaneous fat necrosis of the newborn (SCFN) is a rare form of panniculitis manifesting as erythematous plaques or nodules at sites of brown fat in neonates. Surgical management may be indicated in severe cases; however, there is a paucity of literature compiling presentations and outcomes of these surgical patients. METHODS: The authors performed a systematic review, in consultation with a licensed librarian, on MEDLINE and Embase for studies including patients with SCFN who were surgically managed. RESULTS: The search strategy generated 705 results, among which 213 (30.2%) were excluded for lack of discussion on surgical management. Twenty-two studies discussed surgical management of SCFN in 26 patients, but in 6 of these studies the patients were not surgically managed. Ultimately, 16 articles with 16 patients who were surgically managed were included in the study. Average age at diagnosis was 11.8 ± 9.8 days; average age at surgery was 39.5 ± 70.4 days. The most common etiologies were "unknown" (6, 37.5%), therapeutic hypothermia (4, 25.0%), and birth complications (4, 25.0%). Patients harbored nodules on the back (14, 87.5%), upper extremities (7, 43.8%), lower extremities (7, 43.8%), buttocks (5, 31.3%), and head or neck (3, 18.8%). Linear regression models revealed the presence of back lesions and predicted concomitant medical complications (ß = 2.71, p = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing surgical management for SCFN most commonly harbor lesions on the back and extremities that are secondary to therapeutic hypothermia or of unknown origin. Reporting of additional cases is needed to further elucidate surgical management and outcomes.

Pediatric Plastic Surgery in the COVID-19 Era.

ABSTRACT: The COVID-19 pandemic has forced the healthcare system to adopt novel strategies to treat patients. Pediatric plastic surgeons are uniquely exposed to high rates of infections during examinations and surgeries via aerosol-generating procedures, in part because of the predilection of viral particles for the nasal cavities and pharynx. Telemedicine has emerged as a useful virtual medium for encouraging prolonged patient follow-up while maintaining physical distance. It has proven beneficial in mitigating infection risks while decreasing the financial burden on patients, their families, and healthcare teams. New trends driven by the pandemic added multiple elements to the patient-physician relationship and have left a lasting impact on the field of pediatric plastic surgery in clinical guidelines, surgical care, and patient outcomes. Lessons learned help inform pediatric plastic surgeons on how to reduce future viral infection risk and lead a more appropriately efficient surgical team depending on early triage.

Never events in plastic surgery: An analysis of surgical burns and medical malpractice litigation.

INTRODUCTION: Burns and fires in the operating room are a known risk and their prevention has contributed to many additional safety measures. Despite these safeguards, burn injuries contribute significantly to the medical malpractice landscape. The aim of the present study is to analyze malpractice litigation related to burn and fire injuries in plastic and reconstructive surgery, identify mechanisms of injury, and develop strategies for prevention. METHODS: The Westlaw and LexisNexis databases were queried for jury verdicts and settlements in malpractice lawsuits related to burn and fire injuries that occurred during plastic surgery procedures. The Boolean terms included "burn & injury & plastic", "fire & injury & "plastic surg!"" in Westlaw, and "burn & injury & "plastic surg!"", "fire & injury & "plastic surg!"" in LexisNexis. RESULTS: A total of 46 cases met the inclusion criteria for this study. Overheated surgical instruments and cautery devices were the most common mechanisms for litigation. Plastic surgeons were defendants in 40 (87%) cases. Of the included cases, 43% were ruled in favor of the defendant, while 33% were ruled in favor of the plaintiff. Mishandling of cautery devices 6 (13%), heated surgical instruments 6 (13%), and topical acids 2 (4%) were the most common types of errors encountered. CONCLUSION: Never events causing burn injury in plastic and reconstructive surgery are ultimately caused by human error or neglect. The misuse of overheated surgical instruments and cauterizing devices should be the focus for improving patient safety and reducing the risk of medical malpractice. Forcing functions and additional safeguards should be considered to minimize the risk of costly litigation and unnecessary severe harm to patients.

Surgery or Not? A Systematic Review of Facial Congenital Melanocytic Nevi Treatment Patterns and Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Treatment management for congenital melanocytic nevi (CMN) on the face (FCMN) is highly variable and requires a thorough assessment of multiple factors. To date, a systematic review of FCMN treatment is lacking. The purpose of the present study was to elucidate the frequency, variety, and outcomes of treatment modalities for FCMN with different levels of complexity. METHODS: A comprehensive review of Pubmed, Embase, and Google Scholar databases from 1950 to 2022 was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Articles reporting on FCMN treatment approaches, outcomes, and associated complications were screened and data were extracted according to inclusion criteria. Data were tabulated for thematic analysis of FCMN treatment types, anatomic locations, outcomes, and complications. RESULTS: Of the 561 studies retrieved, 34 met inclusion criteria including 19 surgical treatments, 14 nonsurgical treatments, and one combined surgical and nonsurgical treatment study, totaling 356 patients. The majority of treated FCMN were small-to-medium-sized (56%). Facial CMN treated conservatively were mostly located on the cheek (27%) and/or perinasal region (21%), whereas FCMN treated with surgery were primarily located in the periorbital region (44%) and/or the cheek (17%). Across all treatment cohorts, 22% of patients experienced at least one complication, with 12% of complications experienced by patients treated by surgery. CONCLUSIONS: There is a greater need for standardized FCMN nomenclature that encompasses nevi pattern, dimensions, anatomical coverage, and quantitative measurements of treatment outcome. Future studies should focus on identifying anatomic locations of FCMN that are more prone to complications and determine which treatment approach optimizes outcomes.

Are Gender-Affirming Plastic Surgeons Adequately Compensated? An Analysis of Relative Value Units.

BACKGROUND: Gender-affirming surgery (GAS) has a complicated history within US health care. As GAS procedures and reimbursement availability continue to uptrend, the present study aims to investigate whether compensation is equitable between GAS procedures and general plastic surgery procedures. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for all surgeries performed by plastic surgeons from 2016 to 2020. Cases were assigned to the GAS or non-GAS cohort using ICD-10 codes. Duplicate Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were removed for analysis. Operative time, total wRVUs, wRVUs per hour (wRVU/h), reoperation/readmission rate, and number of concurrent procedures were compared between the cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 132,319 non-GAS and 3,583 GAS were identified. After duplicate CPT removal, 299 cases (21 unique CPTs) remained in the GAS cohort and 20,022 (37 unique CPTs) in the non-GAS cohort. Operative time was higher in the GAS cohort (262.9 vs 120.7 min, P < 0.001), as were total wRVUs (59.4 vs 21.6, P < 0.001). Reoperation/readmission rate (7.0% vs 6.0%) and wRVU/h (15.8 vs 15.1) were not significantly different (all P > 0.05). There was a positive correlation between total operative time and total wRVUs (P < 0.001) and a negative correlation between total operative time and wRVU/h (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Proportional wRVUs are allocated to gender affirming plastic procedures. However, the RVU scale does not allocate proportional wRVUs to longer operative times for both GAS and general plastic surgeries. Compensation for gender affirming plastic surgeries is higher than that of general plastic surgeries; however, there is no difference in wRVUs per hour on comparison.

Vaginal Reconstruction in the Pediatric Population: An Analysis of a National Database.

OBJECTIVE: In the pediatric population, vaginoplasties can be performed in patients with either congenital malformations or acquired conditions. To our knowledge, there has been no study to date investigating the outcomes of vaginoplasty in the pediatric population using a nationwide database. Here, we present a national cohort study of perioperative characteristics and 30-day complications of vaginoplasty in pediatric patients. METHODS: A level II retrospective, prognosis cohort study was performed using the Pediatric National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP-P) database from 2012 to 2020. Data from patients age 0 to 18 who underwent vaginoplasty was queried using CPT code 57,335. Descriptive analysis was performed to elucidate patterns in patient demographics, perioperative characteristics, and 30-day postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 183 patients were identified. Median age was 2.41 years (IQR 0.9 to 12.1). In this population, 58.5% of patients had ASA class 2, and 33.3% ASA class 3. Congenital malformation was present in 75.9%. Average total length of stay was 2.7 days (SD = 3.8) and readmission rate was 7.86%. Complications included urinary tract infection (3.3%), bleeding/transfusions (2.2%), organ/space surgical site infection (1.1%), and superficial incisional surgical site infection (0.6%). The most common procedures performed simultaneously with vaginoplasty included cystourethroscopy (n = 66), clitoroplasty for intersex state (n = 58), and plastic repair of introitus (n = 22). CONCLUSION: Vaginoplasties in the pediatric population were found to have low rates of 30-day readmission and low incidence of 30-day postoperative complications. Further studies focusing on prospective clinical data related to pediatric vaginoplasty can help identify factors to improve long-term outcomes in this population.

Efficacy of the Modified 5-Item Frailty Index in Predicting Surgical-Site Infections in Patients Undergoing Breast Implant Augmentation: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Project-Based 5-Year Study.

Background: The ability to predict breast implant augmentation complications can significantly inform patient management. A frailty measure, such as the modified 5-item frailty index (mFI-5), is becoming an increasingly established risk factor for adverse postoperative outcomes. The authors hypothesized that the mFI-5 is predictive of 30-day postoperative complications in breast augmentation. Objectives: To investigate if mFI-5 can predict the likelihood and magnitude of 30-day complications resulting from breast augmentations. Methods: A retrospective review study of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database for patients who underwent breast implant augmentation without other concurrent procedures, from 2015 to 2019. Age, BMI, number of major comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classifications, smoking status, mFI-5 score, and modified Charlson comorbidity index score were compared as predictors of all-cause 30-day complications and 30-day surgical-site complications using regression analyses. Results: Overall, 2478 patients were analyzed, and among them, 53 patients developed complications (2.14%). mFI-5 score significantly predicted surgical-site infection (SSI) complications (odds ratio [OR] = 4.24, P = .026). Frail patients had a higher occurrence of SSIs than nonfrail patients (P = .049). Multivariable analyses showed ASA class predicted 30-day SSI complications (OR = 5.77, P = .027) and mFI-5 approached, but did not reach full significance in predicting overall 30-day complications (OR = 3.14, P = .085). Conclusions: To date, the impact of frailty on breast implant procedure outcomes has not been studied. Our analysis demonstrates that the mFI-5 is a significant predictor for SSIs in breast implant augmentation surgery and is associated with overall complications. By preoperatively identifying frail patients, the surgical team can better account for postoperative support to minimize the risk of complications.

Clinical Practice Patterns and Evidence-Based Medicine in Rhinoplasty: A 10-Year Review of Continuous Certification Tracer Data from the American Board of Plastic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The American Board of Plastic Surgery (ABPS) has collected data on cosmetic surgery from member surgeons since 2003. These data offer valuable information on national trends in clinical practice. OBJECTIVES: The present study was performed to analyze trends in rhinoplasty over the last decade. METHODS: Tracer data were compared between two cohorts 2012-2016 (early cohort "EC") and 2017-2021 (recent cohort "RC"). Data included patient demographics and surgical techniques. Results were considered in the context of current EBM-based guidance in the plastic surgery literature. RESULTS: Data from 730 rhinoplasties (270 EC and 460 RC) were analyzed. The median age was 30 years, and the most common patient concern was the nasal dorsum (79%). In the RC group, fewer patients voiced concerns about tip projection (58% vs 43%, p = 0.0002) and more complained of functional airway problems (38% vs 49%, p = 0.004). An open approach was most common (83%). Septoplasty (47% vs 52%, p = 0.005), caudal septum repositioning (14% vs 23%, p = 0.002), and tip rotation maneuvers (32% vs 49%, p < 0.0001) became more popular. There was also an increase in the use of spreader grafts (35% vs 45%, p = 0.01) and columellar strut grafts (42% vs 50%, p = 0.04), while there has been a decrease in alar base resection (17% vs 10%, p = 0.007) and non-cartilaginous dorsum/radix augmentation (9% vs 4%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: ABPS tracer data provide an excellent resource for the objective assessment of procedures in plastic surgery. The present study is the first to highlight evolving trends in rhinoplasty over the last 10 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Application of Field Sterility to Safely Reduce Cost and Waste in Cleft Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare spending in the United States remains a major concern, requiring reforms to control spending and curtail costs. Medical supply is one of the largest expenses for hospitals and strategies should be utilized to reduce nonbeneficial service delivery, which increases cost without concomitant increase in value. Introduction of field sterility is one of the potential strategies that has been applied in several surgical disciplines to improve cost-efficiency by reducing overuse of resources and decreasing enormous medical waste. Of course, this must be applied without a diminution in safety. METHODS: The PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane databases from 1980 to 2022 were used to review literature. Key words included "cleft surgery and field sterility," "sterile gloves and oral surgery," "oral surgery and field sterility," "sterile techniques and cleft palate surgery," "sterile versus nonsterile gloves," "sterile and non-sterile gloves and minor surgery," "skin laceration repair and sterile techniques," "sterile gloves and wound suture," "surgical site infection and field sterility," "operating room versus clinical setting," "operating rooms economics and hand surgery," and "main operating room versus ambulatory." RESULTS: The literature search yielded 827 articles. Following evaluation of titles, abstracts, and manuscript contents, 23 articles were ultimately included, of which 10 discussed field sterility and cost-efficiency for cutaneous procedures, 9 hand surgery, and 4 oral surgery. There was no study evaluating field sterility application in cleft surgery. In the reviewed studies, no statistical significance was observed in surgical site infection (SSI) with substantial cost savings and medical waste reduction when hand procedures were performed in ambulatory settings with field sterility compared to the main operating room (OR). Furthermore, no difference was observed for SSI in wound closure, excision of skin lesions, or Mohs micrographic surgery when nonsterile gloves were used. CONCLUSION: The incidence of infection following most cleft-related procedures remains low. As such, the application of field sterility may be ideal for this setting. The cost and waste associated with standard operating protocols are not warranted for many cleft procedures.